Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
-none-

-none-

2004-06-17       - By -not available-
Reply:     <<     111     112     113     114     115     116     117     118     119     120     >>  





-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
      
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
--0-1152524499-1087496870=:31427
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV >Hi , </DIV >
<DIV >  Thanks much for all the replies. I also thought the there some kind of delay/problem with app server and nothing to do with Database. But I couldn 't come to a conlusion as I am not able to  fully understand the trace file. </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >btw this  trace file is genrated when handheld users synch their PDAs to Siebel application via landline phone connections. </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >thanks again for all you time and taking a look into this. </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >-Madhu <BR > <BR > <B > <I > "Daniel W. Fink " <optimaldba@(protected)> </I > </B > wrote: </DIV >
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style= "PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid " >Madhu, <BR > <BR >Events associated with #0 are waits not associated with a cursor. I see these most often when an application has closed all the cursors, but is maintaining a connection. Oracle must associate these events with a cursor, but none are open, so it assigns them to #0. They are not assigned to a subsequent cursor as this cursor has not been opened when the event started. In this case, the XCTEND marks the end of a transaction. (I have not seen the second field as 'rd_onfiltered ' only as 'rd_only ').  I can infer (please correct me if I am wrong) that the cursors associated with the transaction have all executed to completion (successful since rblk is 0, indicating the transaction was not rolled back) and the cursors are not active (but have not been closed since no STAT lines are output). Any subsequent events are associated with #0 (including the log file sync) u
ntil the
next cursor is opened or an existing cursor is reponed. <BR > <BR >The highlighted lines indicate that there is a period of 363.01 seconds where there was no interaction between the application and database. I would ask the app support team if this is normal. In the cases I have worked, this was a sign that an application server was maintaining a connection but not performing any database operations. Since this was expected and normal, I considered these events as truly idle. If the app team says that there should have been database access during that time, you can show that there was not and that the other tiers in the application architecture was consuming the response time. The bottom line in this event pair is that the database was not asked to do any work. <BR > <BR >In terms of #9, that cursor was opened sometime prior to #6. Since the first event associated with #9 in this example is an EXEC, we can infer that #9 has already been parsed (and perhaps even executed 1 or more
times).  If you cannot find #9 in prior lines in the trace file, the tracing was started after #9 was parsed. If you are using MTS or connection pooling, this conclusion may be incorrect and I will defer to those with more experience tracing in that environment. <BR > <BR >Regards, <BR >Daniel Fink <BR > <BR >Madhu Konda wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid20040617124744.98445.qmail@(protected) type= "cite " >
<DIV >
<DIV >
<DIV >Hi All, </DIV >
<DIV >    We are running Oralce 8.1.7. on HP-UX . Recently I traced a  application (third party) and I see some the following information in the trace file . </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >===================== <BR >PARSING IN CURSOR #6 len=181 dep=0 uid=8564 oct=6 lid=8564 tim=1314794115 hv=1049137217 ad= '712a38b0 ' <BR >UPDATE SIEBEL.S_EVT_ACT SET <BR >      LAST_UPD_BY = :1, <BR >      MODIFICATION_NUM = :2, <BR >      APPT_START_DT = :3, <BR >      LAST_UPD = :4 <BR >   WHERE <BR >      ROW_ID = :5 AND MODIFICATION_NUM = :6 <BR >END OF STMT <BR >PARSE #6:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=3,tim=1314794115 <BR >EXEC #6:c=0,e=1,p=0,cr=4,cu=27,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=3,tim=1314794116 <BR >WAIT #6: nam= 'SQL*Net message to client ' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0 <BR >WAIT #6: nam= 'SQL*Net message from client ' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0 <BR >EXEC #9:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=4,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=3,tim=1314794116 <BR >WAIT #9: nam= 'SQL*Net message to client ' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0 <BR >WAIT #9: nam= 'SQL*Net message from client ' ela= 1 p1=1413697536 p2=1
p3=0 <BR >XCTEND rlbk=0, rd_onfiltered=0 <BR >WAIT #0: nam= 'log file sync ' ela= 0 p1=170 p2=0 p3=0 <BR > <STRONG > <FONT style= "BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,0,0) " >WAIT #0: nam= 'SQL*Net message to client ' ela= 0 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0 <BR >*** 2004-06-10 13:55:28.184 <BR >WAIT #0: nam= 'SQL*Net message from client ' ela= 36301 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0 </FONT > </STRONG > <BR >===================== <BR > </DIV >
<DIV >From the trace output I can see that Parse#6,Fetch#6,WAIT#6 are attributed to Curosr #6 . But I am not able to figure out what event is invoking the WAIT#9 and WAIT # 0 . Also I am not able to figure out what event is causing this  huge wait  (363.01 secs)  on SQL*Net message from client . </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >Can somebody please explain me whats going on here. </DIV >
<DIV >  </DIV >
<DIV >TIA, </DIV >
<DIV >Madhu </DIV > </DIV > </DIV >
<P > </P >
<HR SIZE=1 >
Do you Yahoo!? <BR > <A href= "http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo " >Take Yahoo! Mail with you! </A > Get it on your mobile phone. </BLOCKQUOTE > </BLOCKQUOTE > <p >
       <hr size=1 >Do you Yahoo!? <br >
<a href= "http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/*http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail/static/efficiency.html " >New and Improved Yahoo! Mail </a > - 100MB free storage!
--0-1152524499-1087496870=:31427--
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@(protected)
put 'unsubscribe ' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --